1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2000 Peugeot 306
To start off, 2000 Peugeot 306 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Peugeot 306 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Peugeot 306 (100 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Peugeot 306 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 1963 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Peugeot 306, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Peugeot 306 (135 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2000 Peugeot 306 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2000 Peugeot 306 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | Cortina | 306 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 135 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 78.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 82 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 45 L |