1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2000 Proton Saloon
To start off, 2000 Proton Saloon is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Proton Saloon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Proton Saloon (82 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Proton Saloon should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 1963 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Proton Saloon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Proton Saloon (109 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2000 Proton Saloon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2000 Proton Saloon | |
Make | Ford | Proton |
Model | Cortina | Saloon |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 82 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 109 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2390 mm |