1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2001 Opel Omega
To start off, 2001 Opel Omega is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Opel Omega (142 HP) has 93 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Opel Omega (209 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2001 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2001 Opel Omega | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Cortina | Omega |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 142 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 209 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 94.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 75 L |