1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2001 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2001 Toyota RunX is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,792 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Toyota RunX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota RunX (123 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RunX should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 2001 Toyota RunX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RunX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota RunX (161 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota RunX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ford Cortina | 2001 Toyota RunX | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Cortina | RunX |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 90 Nm | 161 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 91.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 55 L |
