1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2002 MCC Smart
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Ford Cortina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Smart (80 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 MCC Smart (110 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2002 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ford Cortina | 2002 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Ford | MCC |
| Model | Cortina | Smart |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 80 HP |
| Torque | 90 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 66.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 67 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 35 L |
