1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (164 HP) has 115 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 1963 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 6 (207 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Cortina | 6 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 164 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 207 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 64 L |