1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2004 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2004 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (240 HP) has 191 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1963 Ford Cortina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (427 Nm) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (85 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2004 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Cortina | Sequoia |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 427 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1223 kg | 2313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3100 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 99 L |