1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2005 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2005 Renault Scenic is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Scenic (137 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 2005 Renault Scenic is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Scenic will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Scenic (191 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2005 Renault Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2005 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Cortina | Scenic |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 137 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 191 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |