1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2005 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2005 Renault Scenic is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Scenic (110 HP) has 61 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 1963 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Scenic (148 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2005 Renault Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2005 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Cortina | Scenic |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 148 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 80.5 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |