1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2006 Honda Accord
To start off, 2006 Honda Accord is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Honda Accord is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda Accord (245 HP) has 196 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 1963 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Honda Accord (286 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2006 Honda Accord will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2006 Honda Accord | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Cortina | Accord |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 245 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 286 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 65 L |