1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2006 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2006 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jeep Cherokee (148 HP) has 99 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 2006 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Cherokee (360 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2006 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2006 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Cortina | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 360 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 70 L |