1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP) has 105 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Cortina | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 102 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3010 mm |