1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2009 SsangYong Rodius
To start off, 2009 SsangYong Rodius is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 SsangYong Rodius is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 SsangYong Rodius (217 HP) has 168 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 SsangYong Rodius should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 SsangYong Rodius weights approximately 811 kg more than 1963 Ford Cortina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 SsangYong Rodius is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 SsangYong Rodius will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 SsangYong Rodius (312 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (85 Nm). This means 2009 SsangYong Rodius will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina. 2009 SsangYong Rodius has automatic transmission and 1963 Ford Cortina has manual transmission. 1963 Ford Cortina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 SsangYong Rodius will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2009 SsangYong Rodius | |
Make | Ford | SsangYong |
Model | Cortina | Rodius |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 217 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 312 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 89.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.6 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1223 kg | 2034 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 80 L |