1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2009 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2009 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 3,545 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota RAV4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota RAV4 (269 HP) has 220 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota RAV4 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 2009 Toyota RAV4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota RAV4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota RAV4 (334 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2009 Toyota RAV4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2009 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Cortina | RAV4 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 3545 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 269 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 334 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |