1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Ram (345 HP) has 296 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 2010 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Ram (510 Nm) has 420 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2010 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Ford | Dodge |
Model | Cortina | Ram |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 345 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 510 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 6350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 4080 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 132 L |