1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2010 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Honda Jazz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Jazz (118 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 1963 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Honda Jazz (145 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2010 Honda Jazz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2010 Honda Jazz | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Cortina | Jazz |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 145 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 42 L |