1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2010 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2010 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover LR3 (296 HP) has 247 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 2010 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover LR3 (316 Nm) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2010 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2010 Land Rover LR3 | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | Cortina | LR3 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 4394 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 296 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 316 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |