1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2011 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2011 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac Escalade (403 HP) has 354 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Cadillac Escalade (565 Nm) has 475 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2011 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2011 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | Cortina | Escalade |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 403 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 565 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 5639 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1892 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3302 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 117 L |