1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mercedes-Benz R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mercedes-Benz R (268 HP) has 219 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz R should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 2011 Mercedes-Benz R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mercedes-Benz R (349 Nm) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2011 Mercedes-Benz R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2011 Mercedes-Benz R | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Cortina | R |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 268 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 349 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 5156 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1958 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1661 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3216 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 80 L |