1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2011 Nissan Note
To start off, 2011 Nissan Note is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Ford Cortina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ford Cortina (106 HP) has 17 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Note. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ford Cortina should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Nissan Note weights approximately 212 kg more than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 1963 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ford Cortina | 2011 Nissan Note | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Cortina | Note |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1386 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 89 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1052 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4083 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1691 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2600 mm |
