1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volvo C30 (114 HP) has 65 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 1963 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C30 (270 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Cortina | C30 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 270 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |