1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volvo C30 (101 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 228 kg more than 1963 Ford Cortina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Cortina | C30 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 101 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1223 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 60 L |