1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2012 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2012 Fiat Bravo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,908 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Fiat Bravo (148 HP) has 99 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 1963 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Fiat Bravo (305 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2012 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2012 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Ford | Fiat |
Model | Cortina | Bravo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1908 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 305 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 90.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 58 L |