1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2012 Nissan NV
To start off, 2012 Nissan NV is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Nissan NV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan NV (261 HP) has 212 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan NV should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan NV (381 Nm) has 291 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan NV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ford Cortina | 2012 Nissan NV | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Cortina | NV |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 261 HP |
| Torque | 90 Nm | 381 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 6111 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 2131 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3711 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 106 L |
