1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP) has 265 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 2013 Cadillac XTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ford Cortina | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
| Make | Ford | Cadillac |
| Model | Cortina | XTS |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 314 HP |
| Torque | 90 Nm | 358 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 86 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 5131 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1852 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2837 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 76 L |
