1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP) has 131 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Cortina | Equinox |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 233 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 98 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4771 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2857 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 71 L |