1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Roadster weights approximately 355 kg more than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 1963 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Roadster (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (149 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Cortina | Roadster |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.8 mm | 85 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3728 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1384 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |