1963 Ford Taunus vs. 1980 Renault 20
To start off, 1980 Renault 20 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,647 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Renault 20 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Renault 20 weights approximately 343 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus.
Because 1963 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Renault 20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ford Taunus | 1980 Renault 20 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Taunus | 20 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1183 cc | 1647 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1188 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2670 mm |
