1963 Ford Taunus vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Renault Clio (107 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Renault Clio weights approximately 65 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Renault Clio (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Taunus. (111 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1991 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Taunus.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Taunus | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Taunus | Clio |
Year Released | 1963 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 107 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 43 L |