1963 Ford Taunus vs. 1996 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1996 Ford Falcon is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 3,707 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Falcon (228 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Falcon weights approximately 735 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Taunus | 1996 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Taunus | Falcon |
Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 3707 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2800 mm |