1963 Ford Taunus vs. 1996 Holden Nova
To start off, 1996 Holden Nova is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Holden Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Holden Nova (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Holden Nova weights approximately 220 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden Nova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Taunus | 1996 Holden Nova | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Taunus | Nova |
Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2470 mm |