1963 Ford Taunus vs. 1996 Lotus Elise
To start off, 1996 Lotus Elise is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Lotus Elise is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotus Elise (116 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elise should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Ford Taunus weights approximately 140 kg more than 1996 Lotus Elise.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Taunus | 1996 Lotus Elise | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Taunus | Elise |
Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 40 L |