1963 Ford Taunus vs. 2000 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2000 Holden Commodore is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Holden Commodore (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Holden Commodore weights approximately 765 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Taunus | 2000 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Taunus | Commodore |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1610 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2950 mm |