1963 Ford Taunus vs. 2001 Honda Mobilio
To start off, 2001 Honda Mobilio is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Ford Taunus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Honda Mobilio (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Honda Mobilio should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Honda Mobilio weights approximately 290 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Honda Mobilio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Honda Mobilio (131 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Taunus. (111 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2001 Honda Mobilio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Taunus.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Taunus | 2001 Honda Mobilio | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Taunus | Mobilio |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 131 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 42 L |