1963 Ford Taunus vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP) has 152 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 700 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Taunus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Taunus | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Taunus | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 190 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 72 L |