1963 Ford Taunus vs. 2005 Nissan Sentra
To start off, 2005 Nissan Sentra is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,398 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Sentra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Sentra (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Sentra should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Sentra weights approximately 407 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Sentra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Taunus | 2005 Nissan Sentra | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Taunus | Sentra |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1252 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 62 L |