1963 Ford Taunus vs. 2005 Renault Megane
To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Megane (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 336 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Megane (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Taunus. (111 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Taunus.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Taunus | 2005 Renault Megane | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Taunus | Megane |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 18.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 1296 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 60 L |