1963 Ford Taunus vs. 2006 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (236 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 340 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Taunus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Taunus | 2006 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Taunus | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 236 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 87 L |