1963 Ford Taunus vs. 2006 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2006 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,398 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota RAV4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota RAV4 (161 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota RAV4 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus.
Because 1963 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota RAV4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Taunus | 2006 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Taunus | RAV4 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 2398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.1 mm | 88.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.9 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |