1963 Ford Taunus vs. 2008 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2008 Nissan Armada is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 5,550 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Armada (317 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 279 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Armada weights approximately 145 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Taunus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Taunus | 2008 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Taunus | Armada |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 5550 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 106 L |