1963 Ford Taunus vs. 2010 Ford F-150
To start off, 2010 Ford F-150 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-150 (248 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1494 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Taunus | 2010 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Taunus | F-150 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 248 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 2339 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5885 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2004 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1887 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 98 L |