1963 Ford Taunus vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Taunus | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Taunus | XF |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 187 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 70 L |