1963 Ford Taunus vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (400 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 362 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 889 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ford Taunus | 2010 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Taunus | XJ |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1183 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 400 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 9.1:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1734 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3170 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 84 L |
