1963 Ford Taunus vs. 2010 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2010 Saturn Outlook is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Saturn Outlook (277 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (53 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus.
Because 1963 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Saturn Outlook (253 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Taunus. (111 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Taunus.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Taunus | 2010 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | Ford | Saturn |
Model | Taunus | Outlook |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 277 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 253 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.9:1 | 11.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1990 mm |