1963 Ford Taunus vs. 2011 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2011 Nissan Frontier is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Frontier (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Taunus | 2011 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Taunus | Frontier |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 3954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 80 L |