1963 Ford Taunus vs. 2012 Ford E-350
To start off, 2012 Ford E-350 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1985 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Taunus | 2012 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Taunus | E-350 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 2830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 2111 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 132 L |