1963 Ford Taunus vs. 2012 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2012 Ford Mustang is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Mustang (412 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 374 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Mustang weights approximately 842 kg more than 1963 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Taunus | 2012 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Taunus | Mustang |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1183 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 412 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 845 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1417 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 61 L |