1963 Ford Taunus vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz R
To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mercedes-Benz R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R (187 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1963 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Taunus.
Because 2012 Mercedes-Benz R is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Taunus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ford Taunus | 2012 Mercedes-Benz R | |
| Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Taunus | R |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1183 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 5156 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1958 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1661 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3216 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 80 L |
