1963 Ford Zodiac vs. 1970 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1970 Triumph Spitfire is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ford Zodiac (108 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1970 Triumph Spitfire. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph Spitfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 520 kg more than 1970 Triumph Spitfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Ford Zodiac (191 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph Spitfire. (99 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 Ford Zodiac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Zodiac | 1970 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Zodiac | Spitfire |
Year Released | 1963 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 191 Nm | 99 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2110 mm |