1963 Ford Zodiac vs. 1986 Acura Integra
To start off, 1986 Acura Integra is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Acura Integra (113 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1963 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Zodiac.
Because 1963 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1986 Acura Integra has automatic transmission and 1963 Ford Zodiac has manual transmission. 1963 Ford Zodiac will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Acura Integra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ford Zodiac | 1986 Acura Integra | |
| Make | Ford | Acura |
| Model | Zodiac | Integra |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 113 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4285 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1665 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2450 mm |
